Motor Control: Scalar vs. Vector Control

Vili Matošević

Control and AVR

September 18, 2024

Introduction

In the world of induction motors, controlling their operation is crucial for efficiency and performance. Two primary methods exist: scalar control, often known as V/f control, and vector control, also referred to as field-oriented control (FOC). These approaches differ significantly in their principles and applications.

Scalar Control (V/f Control)

Principle: Scalar control focuses on managing the magnitude of variables like voltage and frequency, without considering their phase. The most common technique is the V/f (voltage-to-frequency) control.

Mechanism: The motor operates by maintaining a constant ratio between the applied voltage and frequency. This balance ensures that the motor’s magnetic flux remains stable, which is vital for its proper function.

Advantages:

  • Easy to implement.
  • Cost-effective.
  • Adequate for scenarios where precise torque and speed control aren’t critical.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited dynamic performance.
  • Poor torque control, particularly at low speeds.
  • Not suitable for high-performance needs.

Vector Control (Field-Oriented Control - FOC)

Principle: Vector control manages both the magnitude and phase of stator currents. It transforms three-phase stator currents into a rotating reference frame using Clarke and Park transformations, splitting them into two orthogonal components: one for torque and the other for magnetic flux.

Mechanism: By independently controlling flux and torque, vector control allows for precise motor management. The transformed components are controlled separately, then converted back to the three-phase system to regulate the motor.

Advantages:

  • High dynamic performance.
  • Precise torque and speed control, even at low speeds.
  • Ideal for high-performance applications like robotics or electric vehicles.

Disadvantages:

  • More complex to implement.
  • Requires additional sensors and computational resources.
  • Higher cost due to complexity.

Hardware and Sensor Requirements

The hardware and sensors for scalar and vector control differ significantly due to their distinct methods.

Scalar Control (V/f Control) Hardware:

  • Inverter (VFD): A simple three-phase inverter or VFD controls the voltage and frequency, maintaining the V/f ratio.
  • Sensors: Typically none, but basic voltage/current sensors may be used for protection. An optional speed sensor can be added for better regulation.
  • Controller: A basic microcontroller or DSP suffices for generating control signals and implementing the V/f algorithm.

Vector Control (FOC) Hardware:

  • Inverter (VFD): Requires a more advanced VFD for complex computations and precise control.
  • Sensors:
    • Current sensors for phase current measurement.
    • Position/speed sensor (encoder or resolver) for sensored FOC, or estimation algorithms for sensorless FOC.
  • Controller: A powerful DSP or microcontroller for real-time processing, including transformations and control loops.

Soft Start Functionality

Both scalar and vector control can perform soft starts, but with varying degrees of control.

Scalar Control (V/f Control) Soft Start:

  • Gradually ramps voltage and frequency, reducing inrush current.
  • Simple and effective for basic applications but lacks fine torque control.

Vector Control (FOC) Soft Start:

  • Provides a sophisticated soft start by independently controlling torque and speed.
  • Ensures smooth and precise startup, even under varying loads.

Inrush Current Comparison

Starting an induction motor with a direct-on-line (DOL) starter results in a high inrush current, but both control methods reduce this significantly.

Scalar Control (V/f Control):

  • Inrush Current: 2 to 3 times nominal current.
  • Performance: Reduced inrush current but suboptimal torque control.

Vector Control (FOC):

  • Inrush Current: 1.5 to 2 times nominal current.
  • Performance: Minimal inrush current with smooth startup and minimal stress.

Conclusion

Both scalar and vector control methods offer distinct advantages and limitations. Scalar control is simple and cost-effective but lacks precision. Vector control, though complex and costly, provides high-performance control suitable for demanding applications. The choice between them depends on the specific needs of the application, balancing precision, complexity, and cost.

Recent articles